One-punch killer escapes further monitoring out of jail

Friday, 22 May 2026 17:13

While Kieran Loveridge will not be subject to extra monitoring at the end of his sentence for a one-punch killing, an attempt to suppress his identity failed.

Convicted one-punch killer Kieran Loveridge has failed in his bid to protect his identity for two years, having said it would allow him to properly rehabilitate in the community.

The 32-year-old's sentence for the killing of Thomas Kelly on a drunken night out in Kings Cross expired on Sunday, and NSW was unsuccessful in its attempt to subject him to an extended supervision order for high-risk offenders.

NSW Supreme Court Justice Natalie Adams said, despite Loveridge's troubling history of drug use, there was not enough evidence to indicate he required the high level of supervision proposed by the state to integrate back into the community.

Kieran Loveridge (left) wearing handcuffs is escorted from the NSW Supreme Court in 2013.

Loveridge has been on parole since April 2024 and has only committed one offence in that time, a breach of a contact condition in an apprehended violence order.

While the 32-year-old may have had a win on extended supervision by corrective services and police, his concerns about media attention were not upheld by the court.

Kelly's 2012 death and Loveridge's subsequent case grabbed a significant amount of media coverage.

Kelly's manslaughter was one of several incidents that contributed to the introduction of "lock-out" laws in parts of Sydney to prevent alcohol-fuelled violence, Adams said in her judgment.

Loveridge's barrister, Kirsten Edwards SC, said his high media profile upon release led to incidents such as being photographed at a football game and while out in public with his nieces, which have been detrimental to his rehabilitation.

Coward-punch killer Kieran Loveridge outside court in October. (AAP)

"What makes this defendant special ... is that there really aren't many defendants with his profile," Edwards said in a hearing to attempt to have her client's identity suppressed for two years.

"Our submission is that public safety is promoted through his rehabilitation."

But Adams declined to suppress his identity and said it was not adverse media attention but the birth of his child that brought the downturn in his condition.

"Mr Loveridge became overcome by shame that Mr Kelly would never have the opportunity to become a father as he had, and he commenced illicit drug use at this time," Adams said in her judgment.

The state's barrister, Henry El-Hage SC, also argued that the fact that Loveridge provided comments about his condition to The Daily Telegraph in 2024 went against his proposal that media attention was negative for his personal condition.

The state was ordered to pay Loveridge's legal costs in the supervision order case.

NEVER MISS A STORY: Get your breaking news and exclusive stories first by following us across all platforms.