Joel Davis, 31, has been in custody on remand since his arrest in November for allegedly calling for the "rhetorical rape" of independent Wentworth MP Allegra Spender.
A prominent white nationalist has not been allowed outside since before Christmas after being segregated in prison due to his alleged political affiliations, a court has been told.
Joel Davis, 31, has been in custody on remand since his arrest in November for allegedly calling for the "rhetorical rape" of independent Wentworth MP Allegra Spender.
The parliamentarian had condemned the since-disbanded National Socialist Network for holding a police-authorised rally outside the NSW parliament in November.
LIVE UPDATES: Iran says Trump's ceasefire remarks are 'false and baseless'
Davis - a key Sydney ally of the network's leader Thomas Sewell - claims he was using a "philosophical term of art" in the post, but prosecutors allege it encouraged hate and abuse towards Spender.
After three unsuccessful attempts at being granted bail, the 31-year-old escalated the fight to the NSW Supreme Court on Thursday.
He has been kept in segregation in jail because of his suspected political affiliations and has not been outside since December 24, according to documents tendered to the court.
The former mouthpiece has gone as long as four days without showering because he only leaves his cell when escorted to wash, the documents state.
"Those are unusual conditions in custody that most inmates are not experiencing," Justice Natalie Adams noted.
Davis has not yet entered pleas to the charge of using a carriage service to menace, harass or offend.
Delays in the legal system mean he is likely to spend months - if not another year - in similar conditions if he is not granted bail, his barrister Sebastian De Brennan argued.
Prosecutor Laura Goodwin conceded the 31-year-old has experienced hardship over and above what he might have been expected to endure while in custody.
But she argued he should not be released into the community because he might commit serious offences or endanger the safety of individuals or the community.
"The alleged conduct has the capacity to incite others to affect the applicant's desires," Goodwin said.
READ MORE: Marles defends PM's no-news national address
"Some of the messages contain references to actual desires to beat or to otherwise attack, particularly including to rape certain individuals without the qualifier of 'rhetorical'."
The messages might be reviled or seen as extremely unpalatable, but their criminality was contested, De Brennan told the court.
Davis has denied having a violent mindset and is willing to engage in positive change, he said.
An expert report noted that while the 31-year-old still holds the controversial views expressed online, he has reflected on the best ways to communicate and was on the "precipice of change".
The network was deregistered in January, thereby removing his platform for sharing those views, the court was told.
The major consideration for granting bail is what conditions would ensure he doesn't repeat his behaviour, given that he still holds the views, even if he has shown insight into his past approach, Justice Adams said.
"The central hurdle to overcome in this case is that when someone has rigid views, it's hard to modify one's behaviour overnight," she said.
Davis would undertake not to post, appear, or comment publicly on social media, including under aliases or anonymously, amid a suite of strict bail conditions, De Brennan told the court.
Justice Adams was expected to hand down her decision this afternoon.
NEVER MISS A STORY: Get your breaking news and exclusive stories first by following us across all platforms.
- Download the 9NEWS App here via Apple and Google Play
- Make 9News your preferred source on Google by ticking this box here
- Sign up to our breaking newsletter here

